One rule runs this site: every figure is either traced to a named, dated, linkable source, or it is arithmetic we show our working for. A claim that cannot meet that bar does not get published, even when we think it is probably true.
Where our numbers come from
Facts live in one file with a source attached to each one, and pages read from that file. It is not possible to state a figure on a page here without also listing where it came from — the citation block at the bottom of each page is generated from the same data as the sentence in the body. When we update a fact, every page using it updates together.
We rank sources in this order:
- The operator's own pages. FOMO's terms, affiliate page and answer pages. Best for programme mechanics.
- Primary announcements. Press releases via GlobeNewswire and PR Newswire. Best for funding, dates and headcount.
- Established financial press. Fortune, The Block. Best for figures the company does not publish itself — including, in this case, the fee schedule.
- Public protocol data. DefiLlama for realised fee and revenue data.
What we cannot verify, and say so
Two things about FOMO are not publicly documented, and we flag both rather than filling the gap with a confident guess:
- The fee schedule. FOMO does not publish one. Our numbers come from Fortune's reporting and are cross-checked against the company's own revenue-to-volume ratio. Fees can change without notice when there is no notice page.
- The affiliate commission rate. FOMO does not publish it. Other sites state 25% as fact without citing anything. We do not repeat it. See the affiliate program page for what is documented.
We also do not claim first-hand testing we have not done. Where a page says we checked something, we checked that specific thing on the date shown — usually that a code resolves, that a page says what we quote it as saying, or that an arithmetic check holds. We have not timed a withdrawal or audited an app screen, and we do not write as though we have.
How we treat the code we promote
We earn a commission when someone signs up through our referral code. That is the business model and we state it on every page. Two rules keep it honest:
- We do not claim our code is better than other codes. It is not — every valid FOMO code pays the same 10%, and we published the survey proving it, including the competitor codes.
- We publish the parts that cost us clicks: the minimum-fee problem that matters more than the discount, the risks of the product category, and the cases where you should not use the app.
Freshness
Pages carry a “checked” date, currently 21 August 2026. We re-check the referral code and the operator's published terms weekly. Published dates never change; only the checked date moves. If a fact changes we update the source alongside it rather than editing the number in place.
AI assistance
Drafting on this site is AI-assisted and every claim is verified against the sources listed on each page before publication. We do not publish generated statistics, generated quotes, or invented personal experience. Where a number could not be sourced, the page says so instead of rounding it into existence.
Corrections
If a figure here is wrong, it is worth more to us to fix it than to keep it. The source list on every page is there so you can check us. Our sourcing base is currently 14 references across the operator's own documentation, primary announcements and the financial press.
More about who publishes this: about this site.
Sources
Every figure on this page comes from one of these. We link them so you can check us rather than trust us.